The Junto

A Group Blog on Early American History

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Members
    • Ben Park
    • Michael D. Hattem
    • Sara Georgini
    • Rachel Herrmann
    • Joseph M. Adelman
    • Kenneth Owen
    • Tom Cutterham
    • Jessica Parr
    • Roy Rogers
    • Christopher Jones
    • Michael Blaakman
    • Sara Damiano
    • Christopher F. Minty
    • Al Zuercher Reichardt
    • Seth Perry
    • Casey Schmitt
    • Mark Boonshoft
    • Katy Lasdow
    • Matt Karp
    • Glenda Goodman
    • Eric Herschthal
    • Mandy Izadi
    • Hannah Bailey
    • Jordan Taylor
    • Julia M Gossard
    • Nora Slonimsky
    • Carla Cevasco
    • Emily Yankowitz
    • Adam McNeil
    • Elbra David
    • Ebony Jones
    • Philippe Halbert
    • Vanessa Holden
    • Lindsay Keiter
  • Resources
    • Archive
    • Index
    • Bibliography
    • Links
  • The Junto Podcast Network
    • The JuntoCast
    • The History Carousel
  • Contribute

Tag Archives: public engagement

Guest Post: New England Beginnings

January 24, 2017 By The Junto Moderator in Announcements, Guest Posts, Public History Tags: Francis J. Bremer, Massachusetts, New England, Plymouth, public engagement, Public History Leave a comment

Francis J. Bremer is Professor Emeritus of History at Millersville University of Pennsylvania and has been a visiting scholar at Oxford and Cambridge universities in England, and Trinity College in Dublin, among other institutions. He has published numerous books and articles on puritanism in the Atlantic World, most notably John Winthrop: America’s Forgotten Founding Father (Oxford, 2003); Building a New Jerusalem: John Davenport, a Puritan in Three Worlds (Yale, 2012); and Lay Empowerment and the Development of Puritanism (Macmillan, 2015). He is editor of the Winthrop Papers for the Massachusetts Historical Society and Coordinator of New England Beginnings, a partnership to commemorate the cultures that shaped New England.

fjb-picNew England Beginnings is a partnership of New England historical organizations and museums, ancestry organizations, and participating scholars formed in 2015 to plan efforts to commemorate the cultures that shaped New England on the occasion of the four hundredth anniversaries of events such as the founding of Plymouth and the settlement of Massachusetts. The goals of the partnership are to 1) tell the stories of the region in the seventeenth century to a wide, general public audience and 2) to enhance accessibility of resources for future scholarship in the field. The website identifies the partners; offers narrative of what was happening “400 Year Ago;” provides information on events, programs, opportunities; podcasts and videos; and a bibliography.

While this is early days for the partnership, which is working to produce programs for 2020, some initiatives have come to fruition:

Programs to Facilitate scholarship:

The Massachusetts Historical Society has put an electronic, searchable edition of the first four published volumes of the Winthrop Papers online on their website. This will eventually be followed by the remaining published volumes, further correspondence, a collection of Winthrop religious writings, and an edition of John Winthrop Jr.’s medical notebook.

The Commonwealth Library has the manuscript of William Bradford’s Of Plymouth Plantation online. With the support of the Colonial Society a team has been put together to produce a new transcript and annotation reflecting both the Pilgrim and native points of view with Jeremy Bangs of the Leiden American Pilgrim Museum and Francis J. Bremer providing the former, and Paula Peters of the Wampanoag tribe providing the native perspective. A grant request for NEH funding is pending.

Programs to educate a wide public audience:

The Congregational Library and Archives has produced “Puritan Boston Tests Democracy,” a free app for phones and tablets. The app can be used anywhere to learn the basic history of the people, places, and events that shaped early Boston, but can also be used with its GPS feature to do a self-guided tour of those sites.

Participating scholars have agreed to offer talks and/or discussion to high school and university classes, as well as church and civic groups via tele-conference, Skype, FaceTime or similar technology. The scholars will donate a modest fee (probably $100) to New England Beginnings to cover partnership costs moving forward.

On Christmas Day the Associated Press released a story (“Scholars Team Up to Dispel 400 Year Old ‘Fake News’ About US”) which was picked up by well over a hundred media outlets in this country and abroad. The reaction by those who bothered to use online TV and newspaper “comment” opportunities was overwhelmingly hostile. Typical comments included:

  • “’Leading scholars from around the globe are teaming up to shed more light on how America got its start.’ Translate to: We are coming to rewrite your history for you, U.N. style!”
  • “Liberal army assault continues unabated. The only way to stop liberals from their agenda is to treat this as a war and they are the enemy.”
  • “Any time I hear ‘scholars say …’ I take it with not just a grain of salt but a whole spoonful.”
  • “President Trump is a very wise man. ‘Common Core’ will be, in fact, rescinded. History will once again be taught in our schools. ‘Angry White Men’ know history. Liberal professors and liberal public teachers will now be held accountable for truth. ‘Indoctrination’ of our young will leave with the Obama legacy. State-run schools will now have the power to keep education unblemished from liberal trash.”
  • “The story will be, no doubt, shedding ‘new’ light on how White People screwed over everybody. It started with Columbus, and will no doubt end when liberals get tired of crapping on White People.”
  • “Suggestion, read Rush Limbaugh’s book ‘The Brave Pilgrims.’ It will enlighten most ‘scholars,’ were that possible.

Some will be quick to discount such comments as coming from the same element of the population that are Biblical literalists denying evolution, those who reject climate change, and groups promoting white nationalism. But these comments come from citizens, and citizens who are a significant enough element in our society to help explain the election of Donald Trump. If our goal as educators is to develop in our students an ability to evaluate things with open and reflective minds and our task as historians to explain the complexities of the past—painting the picture with the warts, but not only focusing on the warts—we have clearly failed with this segment of the population. The adherence of these commentators (and rest assured, many who didn’t bother to write) to the old black hat (natives)/ white hat (settlers) story speaks to the need for us to do a better job of explaining the past. But in doing so we should recognize that many scholars have fallen into a comparable paradigm whereby puritans are simplistically depicted as black hats (intolerant, misogynist, religious fanatics, racist—in other words warts only) and natives as white hats (victims, proto-environmentalists, etc.).

What is necessary, and what the goal of New England Beginnings is, is to develop nuanced appreciations of all the cultures that shaped New England scholars that rejects all faith as fanaticism and judges too much of the past by modern values. Challenging as this will be, what makes success even more problematic is the widespread rejection of expertise by many of our fellow citizens. How can we persuade people who reject our claim that years of studying the sources gives us a greater insight into the past? The identification of the scholarly community as something that needs to be discarded and its members purged (Professor Watch Lists) threatens us individually but more than that threatens the integrity of academe. One can laugh at the idea of learning about the Pilgrims from a children’s book written by Rush Limbaugh, but it is in its own way the same as people turning to and relying on only the news outlets that reinforce their existing beliefs.

Spread the word:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
Like Loading...

Audiences, Publicity, and Engaged Academics

March 3, 2014 By Joseph M. Adelman in Academia, Public History Tags: academic v. popular history, Nicholas Kristof, public engagement 17 Comments

Town crier, Provincetown, Cape Cod, Mass., courtesy Boston Public Library

Let me start by asking a question: how many people think that a producer, reporter, or intern for CNN, NBC, or any other news organization actually reads full articles in Nature, Science, or the New England Journal of Medicine to find out about the latest scientific and medical breakthroughs for their news reporting?

Yeah, me neither. So what’s really going on when journalists spend two weeks suggesting that journal articles are out of touch and inaccessible? And if there’s a kernel of truth to the claim, is there anything we as scholars can do to address the concern?

Continue reading →

Spread the word:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
Like Loading...

Post navigation

What is “The Junto?”

The Junto is a group blog made up of junior early Americanists—graduate students and junior faculty—dedicated to providing content of general interest to other early Americanists and those interested in early American history, as well as a forum for discussion of relevant historical and academic topics.

Follow

      

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Each contributor to the blog retains the rights to their own individual contributions. If you would like to use any content in full, please email us at: thejuntoblog [at] gmail [dot com].

Facebook

Facebook
My Tweets

What’s Being Read Today

  • Guest Post: The Problem of Loyalism before the American Revolution
    Guest Post: The Problem of Loyalism before the American Revolution
  • Seriously, though, was the American Revolution a Civil War?
    Seriously, though, was the American Revolution a Civil War?
  • James Rivington: Printer, Loyalist, Spy?
    James Rivington: Printer, Loyalist, Spy?
  • The Marriage of Angelica and John
    The Marriage of Angelica and John
  • Legal Professionalization and the American Revolution
    Legal Professionalization and the American Revolution
  • Narrative History and the Collapsing of Historical Distance
    Narrative History and the Collapsing of Historical Distance
  • Rethinking the Early American Map
    Rethinking the Early American Map
  • The "War on Christmas" in Early America
    The "War on Christmas" in Early America
  • The Problem with Big Books; Or, Alan Taylor's Biggest Sin
    The Problem with Big Books; Or, Alan Taylor's Biggest Sin
  • A Very Old Book: The Case for Eric Hobsbawm’s Age of Revolution
    A Very Old Book: The Case for Eric Hobsbawm’s Age of Revolution

Recent Comments

  • How to Spot and Fix Venue Mistakes Before Filing Mandamus Cases - Criminal Immigration Law Firm in New York, New Jersey on The Great Writing and Editing Extravaganza of 2013
  • Why Writ of Mandamus Cases Matter in U.S. Legal History - Criminal Immigration Law Firm in New York, New Jersey on Q&A: Ernesto Bassi, author of An Aqueous Territory
  • A Deep Dive into Contempt of Court for Injunction Violations - Criminal Immigration Lawyer in NY & NJ on Why We Doubt Capable Children: Constructing Childhood in the Revolutionary Era
  • Comparative Analysis: Understanding Different Writs in Law Made Easy - Writ of Mandamus Law firm on Review: Wim Klooster, Revolutions in the Atlantic World: A Comparative History, New Edition
  • Understanding the Format of a Writ Petition Mandamus Explained - Criminal Immigration Law Firm in New York, New Jersey on Q&A: Ernesto Bassi, author of An Aqueous Territory

What We Write About

17th Century 18th Century 19th Century Abolitionism Abraham Lincoln academia Adams African-American history AHA Alexander Hamilton American Revolution Antebellum Archives Atlantic History Atlantic World Benjamin Franklin book review British Empire capitalism Caribbean Civil War conferences Constitution cultural history Digital History digital humanities Early Republic Fashion Founders Gender George Washington graduate school Guest Posts historical memory historiography History of Fashion Interview Job Market John Adams Junto March Madness March Madness Maritime history material culture McNeil Center for Early American Studies Methodology museums Narrative History Native American history Native Americans New England newspapers New York City Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture pedagogy Political history Politics Popular History Print Culture Public History Publishing race religion religious history research Roundtable Slavery teaching The JuntoCast Thomas Jefferson twitter vastearlyamerica Virginia women women's history writing

Archives

Categories

Other Blogs

Religion in American History
The Historical Society
The Way of Improvement Leads Home
Historiann
Boston 1775
U.S. Intellectual History
Gradhacker
History Carnival
Profhacker
Uncommonplace Book
Age of Revolutions
Black Perspectives
Uncommon Sense–The Blog

The Junto

Footer menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Members
  • Resources
  • The Junto Podcast Network
  • Contribute
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
↑
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Junto
    • Join 4,780 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Junto
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d